The Great Editing Debate

Those who know me will know I’m a bit of an Apple fan. Having bought an iPhone 3G back in 2008 I’ve become a firm believer in how well the different devices interact with each other and how simple everything is to run. As a result this household now has a complete array of Apple products from AppleTV to MacBooks, and with recent software updates photo editing, storage and display has never been easier.

Yes, iTunes is a bit of a beast these days and could do with simplifying. But generally speaking Apple’s software (and indeed operating system, be it iOS or Mavericks) does what it says on the tin and works very well for the purpose it is designed for. This fact extends to their Aperture software which I have been using since early 2011. Aperture is a typical piece of Apple software – clean, simple, and easy to use. The way it holds images and creates a library for them is simplicity in itself, and the editing tools work for me most of the time – some complex edits need to be done in Photoshop, but not that many. The biggest omission from Aperture is the lack of lens correction, but for most images this isn’t a big deal. It looks clean, it is easy to navigate and easy to publish from. I’ve got all my photos sorted and easy to find in Aperture, which looks like this – this is the Projects view where each day is sorted into its own folder.

The "Projects" page - each photo day is easily sorted.

Just recently though I’ve found myself using the Photoshop Raw processing more and more. Partly for the lens correction abilities, but also because it just seems that little bit better at dragging the details out of the original raw image. Switching between Aperture and Photoshop is not that easy because you cannot export a RAW file from Aperture into Photoshop – it sends a TIFF file across so you lose the ability to edit the raw data. I’ve been exporting the RAW file onto the desktop and editing it in Photoshop before saving the file and re-importing the edit back into Aperture. Not a big deal, but it adds a bit of faff to my workflow.

So with the thought in my mind that Adobe software does improve the quality of the editing I’m trying out Lightroom 5. Many of my photography friends use Lightroom and swear by it, some even swear in front of it I’m sure so I’ve installed it and copied all of my 2014 images across to have a proper play when I already have a rough idea of the outcome. That was the first problem before I even got to edit everything – Lightroom doesn’t manage the library – it expects you to. Lightroom is nowhere near as intuitive, clean or simple as Aperture either – it takes me an age to find anything but that should improve with time. The key thing for me is that it doesn’t look as easy to use, far too many drop-downs or hidden options. Below is a shot of Lightroom in Library mode.

As I say, nowhere near as clean. You can’t view an image in perfect full-screen. You sort of can, but it retains a border oddly and I can’t remove it. Publishing images on Aperture is a one-click process, highlight the image(s) and send them to Flickr or SmugMug. It seems way more difficult on Lightroom and takes much more time, the same with exporting – although I’ll admit I’ve found a slightly quicker way to do that now.

But for editing the image, once I’d moved into the “Develop” section and found the controls anyway, Lightroom is brilliant. It has the Adobe Camera Raw engine built-in, so the edits in Lightroom are the same as I’d do in Photoshop. I can bring out far more details in Lightroom than I can in Aperture, I can do the lens corrections automatically, the sharpening and noise reduction sliders actually work in Lightroom too. Big plusses there, and I can also send files from Lightroom directly to Photomatix and have the result returned to Lightroom. Bingo. There is a Photomatix plug-in for Aperture which does it in-house but it just isn’t quite as good as the main program. I posted two identical images on Facebook recently – one edited in Aperture, the other Lightroom – and the Lightroom picture was almost universally preferred – including by myself.

The final nail in Lightroom’s coffin for me is the ability to share images easily. Using Aperture all my devices (iPad, iPhone, AppleTV) are automatically synchronised with the latest images through iTunes. I don’t have to think about it, I have it set up in iTunes for each device and they just update. Not possible in Lightroom, iTunes doesn’t talk to it – I’d have to get iTunes to look in the folders and that is a receipe for disaster in my mind.

So where do I go from here? I love the editing power of Lightroom, but hate the complexity of the library (or lack thereof) and incompatibility with everything else. It seems far too complicated generally, too many hidden functions and cluttered displays although I’m sure this is a) a matter of personal preferences, b) customisable and c) I’ll get used to it eventually! I’m going to try taking some images and using Lightroom to edit them before using Aperture as my storage library, but that kind of defeats the object I reckon. The aim was to simplify my workflow, if my workflow has to include exporting to the desktop and back into Aperture occasionally well so be it. I think I’ll be waiting for Apple to finally release Aperture 4 and hope it is a significant improvement in the editing department, because as a library and a tool generally it is still well ahead in my opinion.

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /homepages/32/d547234615/htdocs/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 405

5 Responses to “The Great Editing Debate”

  1. Macgeth says:

    Adrian, Superb article.
    As a Mac user, one sometimes feels a bit of an Adobe outsider.

    I certainly agree with all the points made, just wish Aperture included things like lens correction, editing functionality, like onOne’s perfect suite and more pre-sets, inc HDR. I am trying to add a graduated filter to some of the skies in images i took recently, i had to go to PSE as the Aperture brush tool not really that good.

    I love the way Aperture “talks” to other Mac software like iTunes, FCP and iWeb and a hole host of Mac devices. so thats why we stick with it.

    I said i would give Apple until May 14, before switching to Lightroom, but what you have said makes me think i should hold off a bit longer.

    I for one, would really be interested in the outcome of your experiment with Lightroom.

  2. HH says:

    If my experience is anything to go by, Lightroom is a steep learning curve, but once you’re there, it’s awesome. I couldn’t do without it.
    I invested a bit of time with Nat Coalson’s LR3 book at the start (this was a few years back), and knowing all the little shortcuts makes LR so much easier to navigate.
    Have you tried any of the KelbyOne intro courses? How to manage/organise a LR catalogue is one of those ‘light the blue touchpaper and stand well back’ issues. 😉

    • Adrian says:

      Cheers for that. No I haven’t tried any books or the KelbyOne courses – but have sat through most of the Adobe ones. I still prefer the editing in Lightroom, but that is about it unfortunately.

      • HH says:

        I moved from the god-awful Photoshop Elements photo manager to LR3. I’d say it was probably a month before I stopped wanting to throw the computer out of the window… but then it just clicked. Mind you, I did invest a lot of time in building keyword lists and such.
        Importing into LR is notoriously slow, but a lot depends on how you’ve setup preview creation etc.

        By the way, full screen is ‘F’. 🙂

        If it’s any use, my fav shortcuts are:
        G – Grid / Library

        D – Development Module
        R – Crop
        F – Full screen
        J – Clipping
        A – Visualise Spots (When spot healing tool is selected)
        Z – Zoom to 100%
        \ – Before/After
        Shift + M – Radial Filter
        ‘ – Invert Radial Filter

        Also in the Dev module, CTRL+1 opens the Basic panel, CTRL+2 opens Tone Curve & so on.

        As well as KelbyOne, Gavin Hoey did a free Lightroom series on his YouTube channel.

Leave a Comment